IDP Question

[cowslip]

  On 2/16/2025 at 11:41 PM, Khunmark said:

Well at least this comment wasn’t  your usual cut and paste job. That’s all it has going for it. 

Expand  

I find your use of the term “cut and paste” in your reply to be just lazy and obnoxious.

By responding with "cut and paste" without any context, you're not engaging with what was said—you're just making a vague, dismissive remark instead of offering a real counterpoint. It’s the kind of reply people throw out when they have nothing intelligent to add but still want to feel like they’ve "called you out" on something.

If your issue is that you think the post was copied from somewhere else, you should say so directly and explain why that matters or give evidence.

In reality, you’re just being passive-aggressive. You are in fact attacking the messenger and not the message, aren’t you?

Copying and pasting is often just a practical way to avoid typos and make sure a reply is well-structured. Rather than typing on my phone.

When you make comments like that it invalidates your response and is ridiculous.

Honestly, if you best argument is "cut and paste," you don’t have an argument at all.

[Khunmark]

  On 2/17/2025 at 9:52 AM, cowslip said:

obnoxious

Expand  

That’s a laugh- you wrote the book. Despite your meanderings on the subject your original assertion that ‘all foreigners who stay Thailand longer than 3 months should get a drivers license remains baseless. Due to this and other ridiculous claims you have made in the past, I’m inclined to think that you don’t believe in the rubbish you post and you are a bad faith actor.

[cowslip]

  On 2/17/2025 at 12:57 PM, Khunmark said:

That’s a laugh- you wrote the book. Despite your meanderings on the subject your original assertion that ‘all foreigners who stay Thailand longer than 3 months should get a drivers license remains baseless. Due to this and other ridiculous claims you have made in the past, I’m inclined to think that you don’t believe in the rubbish you post and you are a bad faith actor.

Expand  

so no answer as I thought!. Check you insurance - obviously like so many foreigners you arrogantly drive around thinking you are superior to tHai people and above the law. So make up your mind about "cut and paste"....

As ever your reply is nothing but insults and baseless accusations. Instead of addressing the actual argument, you resort to calling my claims ‘rubbish’ and an attempt at labelling me a ‘bad faith actor’—which is just a weak deflection from the fact that you have no counterargument.

The reality is simple: foreigners staying in Thailand for more than 90 days must obtain a Thai driver’s license to legally drive. If you think that’s wrong, then prove it with actual legal references instead of throwing around empty rhetoric. Until you can do that, your response is nothing more than hot air.

And as for your ‘cut and paste’ nonsense, you haven’t even attempted to argue against my point—you’re just grasping at straws to avoid engaging with the facts. Either bring something substantive to the discussion, or don’t waste my time.

[cowslip]

Thailand is a signatory to the 1968 Vienna Convention on Road Traffic, which establishes rules for the reciprocal recognition of foreign driving licences. Under this convention, individuals holding valid driving licences from their home countries can use them in Thailand temporarily, typically up to 90 days. Beyond this period, foreigners residing in Thailand must obtain a Thai driving license to remain compliant with local laws.

The primary reason for requiring a local driving license after 90 days is to ensure that all drivers are familiar with Thai traffic laws and road conditions. Thai traffic regulations, road signs, and driving customs may differ significantly from those in other countries. Additionally, many insurance policies stipulate that claims will not be processed unless the driver possesses a valid Thai driving licence. This makes converting a foreign license essential for legal and financial protection.

https://benoit-partners.com/driving-license-bangkok/#:~:text=Under this convention%2C individuals holding,remain compliant with local laws

[Khunmark]

  On 2/25/2025 at 11:33 AM, cowslip said:

driving customs

Expand  

Please elaborate.

[cowslip]

  On 2/25/2025 at 11:53 AM, Khunmark said:

Please elaborate.

Expand  

Clearly you are not asking in good faith - you are sealioning. the subject was the 90 day necessity to get a Thai licence.

Are you feigning ignorance or am I to assume that you haven't driven very much in Thailand?  You are claiming to no little about driving in the contry yet arguing on a topic which you now claim to know little about.

[Khunmark]

  On 2/25/2025 at 3:01 PM, cowslip said:

claiming to no little

Expand  

Claiming to know little. 
 

Seeing that rather than address my question you have engaged in deflection, I’ll make my question more specific.

In the process of obtaining a Thai driver licence direct me to where Thai driving customs is mentioned?

[cowslip]

  On 2/25/2025 at 10:28 PM, Khunmark said:

Claiming to know little. 
 

Seeing that rather than address my question you have engaged in deflection, I’ll make my question more specific.

In the process of obtaining a Thai driver licence direct me to where Thai driving customs is mentioned?

Expand  

Seriuously? - https://benoit-partners.com/driving-license-bangkok/#:~:text=Under this convention%2C individuals holding,remain compliant with local laws

[Khunmark]

  On 2/26/2025 at 7:35 AM, cowslip said:

Seriuously? - https://benoit-partners.com/driving-license-bangkok/#:~:text=Under this convention%2C individuals holding,remain compliant with local laws

Expand  

Firstly, the link you posted makes no reference to ‘driving customs’, it seems this is another invention of your mind. Secondly, the link you posted is obviously a parody which you failed to recognise. In the opening paragraph it comes up with this pearler;

Thailand enforces strict driving laws

So how about addressing the original question? What is Thai driving customs and how is it taught to foreigners during the licensing process? I want more than your usual copy and paste reply. And the information you linked contradicts your 90 day deadline. I very much doubt you read the stuff you share.

[cowslip]

  On 2/26/2025 at 11:21 AM, Khunmark said:

Firstly, the link you posted makes no reference to ‘driving customs’, it seems this is another invention of your mind. Secondly, the link you posted is obviously a parody which you failed to recognise. In the opening paragraph it comes up with this pearler;

Thailand enforces strict driving laws

So how about addressing the original question? What is Thai driving customs and how is it taught to foreigners during the licensing process? I want more than your usual copy and paste reply. And the information you linked contradicts your 90 day deadline. I very much doubt you read the stuff you share.

Expand  

you really are a piece of work - you have a eference - you were wrong - suck it up!

[cowslip]

  On 2/26/2025 at 11:21 AM, Khunmark said:

Firstly, the link you posted makes no reference to ‘driving customs’,

Expand  

yes it does

[Khunmark]

  On 2/26/2025 at 11:56 AM, cowslip said:

yes it does

Expand  

You’re lost without cut and paste.

[cowslip]

  On 2/27/2025 at 12:39 AM, Khunmark said:

You’re lost without cut and paste.

Expand  

you're just lost - period.....

I find your use of the term “cut and paste” in your reply to be just lazy and obnoxious.

By responding with "cut and paste" without any context, you're not engaging with what was said—you're just making a vague, dismissive remark instead of offering a real counterpoint. It’s the kind of reply people throw out when they have nothing intelligent to add but still want to feel like they’ve "called you out" on something.

If your issue is that you think the post was copied from somewhere else, you should say so directly and explain why that matters or give evidence.

In reality, you’re just being passive-aggressive. You are in fact attacking the messenger and not the message, aren’t you?

Copying and pasting is often just a practical way to avoid typos and make sure a reply is well-structured. Rather than typing on my phone.

When you make comments like that it invalidates your response and is ridiculous.

Honestly, if you best argument is "cut and paste," you don’t have an argument at all.

 You have an answer – you don’t like it and now you are just rambling…. You keep using of the term “cut and paste”; it has no relevance and you do even make an implication, your replies are now just lazy and obnoxious and intellectually stunted.

By repeatedly posting  "cut and paste" without any context, you're not engaging with what was said—you're just making a vague, dismissive remark instead of offering a real counterpoint. Because there is nothing to dismiss – and in your heart of hearts, you know it. Your replies have become the kind of response people throw out when they have nothing intelligent to add but still want to feel like they’ve "called you out" on something…..but you can’t and you haven’t.

If your issue is that you think the post was copied from somewhere else, you should say so directly and explain why you think that matters do something you have failed to do so far, give evidence! Although it’s not even clear what you are arguing about – just mindless gainsaying.

In reality, you’re just being passive-aggressive. You are in fact attacking the messenger and not the message, aren’t you?

Copying and pasting is often just a practical way to avoid typos and make sure a reply is well-structured. Rather than typing on my phone.

 When you make comments like that it invalidates your response and is ridiculous.

Honestly, if you best argument is "cut and paste," you don’t have an argument at all.

[Khunmark]

  On 2/28/2025 at 7:52 PM, cowslip said:

you're just lost - period.....

I find your use of the term “cut and paste” in your reply to be just lazy and obnoxious.

By responding with "cut and paste" without any context, you're not engaging with what was said—you're just making a vague, dismissive remark instead of offering a real counterpoint. It’s the kind of reply people throw out when they have nothing intelligent to add but still want to feel like they’ve "called you out" on something.

If your issue is that you think the post was copied from somewhere else, you should say so directly and explain why that matters or give evidence.

In reality, you’re just being passive-aggressive. You are in fact attacking the messenger and not the message, aren’t you?

Copying and pasting is often just a practical way to avoid typos and make sure a reply is well-structured. Rather than typing on my phone.

When you make comments like that it invalidates your response and is ridiculous.

Honestly, if you best argument is "cut and paste," you don’t have an argument at all.

 You have an answer – you don’t like it and now you are just rambling…. You keep using of the term “cut and paste”; it has no relevance and you do even make an implication, your replies are now just lazy and obnoxious and intellectually stunted.

By repeatedly posting  "cut and paste" without any context, you're not engaging with what was said—you're just making a vague, dismissive remark instead of offering a real counterpoint. Because there is nothing to dismiss – and in your heart of hearts, you know it. Your replies have become the kind of response people throw out when they have nothing intelligent to add but still want to feel like they’ve "called you out" on something…..but you can’t and you haven’t.

If your issue is that you think the post was copied from somewhere else, you should say so directly and explain why you think that matters do something you have failed to do so far, give evidence! Although it’s not even clear what you are arguing about – just mindless gainsaying.

In reality, you’re just being passive-aggressive. You are in fact attacking the messenger and not the message, aren’t you?

Copying and pasting is often just a practical way to avoid typos and make sure a reply is well-structured. Rather than typing on my phone.

 When you make comments like that it invalidates your response and is ridiculous.

Honestly, if you best argument is "cut and paste," you don’t have an argument at all.

Expand  

Your other talent (aside from cutting and pasting material you haven’t bothered to read) is obfuscation. Fortunate for your posting rights that thethaiger sets a low bar.

[AussieBob]

Back to reality ........ An IDP is required to drive an insured vehicle from a rental company in Thailand - without one they wont rent you a car as their insurance is void.  An IDP is not required to drive a private car (owned by Expat, relative or friend) and as long as the licence is in English it will be accepted by the local Police as a valid driving licence. 

When an Expat is staying past 90 days (long term Visa), they are 'expected; to get a Thai driving licence, not because of any Thai road rules, but because of the fact that the Expat is living long term in Thailand. The foreign licence will be accepted by the local Police, again - as long as it is in English and still valid. However, when it comes to insurance issues after an accident, not having a Thai driving licence when living here long term could be a problem - it all depends on the situation. It is wise to get a Thai licence if living here long term - and is sometimes accepted as a form of ID.

I have done it twice - Chiang Mai and Rayong - easy - do an online test to show you know the rules (basically the same as any other left hand side driving country) - then turn up for eyesight and reaction test (hitting brakes quick enough). 

[cowslip]

I've had a Thai licence for over 20 years. 

Since 2020 you need an IDP   on any vehicle on a foreign licence. 

An IDP under rhe Vienna Convention 1968 lasts for 3 years so long as your home licence is valid.

With motorcycles, Thailand only recognises category A... not A1. So unless you have a full M/C licence from home, you aren't covered.

[rattlesnake]

  On 3/1/2025 at 7:48 AM, cowslip said:

I've had a Thai licence for over 20 years. 

Since 2020 you need an IDP   on any vehicle on a foreign licence. 

An IDP under rhe Vienna Convention 1968 lasts for 3 years so long as your home licence is valid.

With motorcycles, Thailand only recognises category A... not A1. So unless you have a full M/C licence from home, you aren't covered.

Expand  

Yes indeed, to ride a motorcycle of any size in Thailand, even a Honda Wave, one needs a motorcycle licence (which I think makes total sense).

[AussieBob]

  On 3/15/2025 at 5:53 PM, rattlesnake said:

Yes indeed, to ride a motorcycle of any size in Thailand, even a Honda Wave, one needs a motorcycle licence (which I think makes total sense).

Expand  

Many years ago in Australia they combined the car and motorcycle licence into the one licence. They were both tested and verified separately, and you could get one and then get the other added. It makes sense to me that they should both be separate - you cannot combine a truck and car licence together - so why a bike and car.  I guess this might be a reason why some people who actually have a 'bike licence' but have not actually ridden a bike for decades, get into trouble quickly here in Thailand. 

Speaking of trouble. Has anyone else seen the youtube vid of some random that has been living in Thailand since 1991 stated that the best thing about Thailand is being able to ride his motorbike everywhere in the rural areas with freedom (I guess he means over the speed limits). I must say that it is so good to be able to drive in Thailand without the constant fear of a $300-$1000 fine for going 5-20Ks over the limit, and therefore no need to be constantly checking what the speed limit is. If I was going to ride those roads, I would definitely use a 'real' bike (min 900ccs) and stay ahead of all the Thai crazies - but it would still be a negative - because instead of always watching for speed limits and cops with radar, I would be constantly watching for Somchais doing something stupid and/or dangerous. Last time we were passed by 4 big bikes in a group - IMO that is the only way I would do it - and with loud exhausts so they can hear us coming.  

[rattlesnake]

  21 hours ago, AussieBob said:

Many years ago in Australia they combined the car and motorcycle licence into the one licence. They were both tested and verified separately, and you could get one and then get the other added. It makes sense to me that they should both be separate - you cannot combine a truck and car licence together - so why a bike and car.  I guess this might be a reason why some people who actually have a 'bike licence' but have not actually ridden a bike for decades, get into trouble quickly here in Thailand. 

Speaking of trouble. Has anyone else seen the youtube vid of some random that has been living in Thailand since 1991 stated that the best thing about Thailand is being able to ride his motorbike everywhere in the rural areas with freedom (I guess he means over the speed limits). I must say that it is so good to be able to drive in Thailand without the constant fear of a $300-$1000 fine for going 5-20Ks over the limit, and therefore no need to be constantly checking what the speed limit is. If I was going to ride those roads, I would definitely use a 'real' bike (min 900ccs) and stay ahead of all the Thai crazies - but it would still be a negative - because instead of always watching for speed limits and cops with radar, I would be constantly watching for Somchais doing something stupid and/or dangerous. Last time we were passed by 4 big bikes in a group - IMO that is the only way I would do it - and with loud exhausts so they can hear us coming.  

Expand  

I rode a Honda 500 VTC in France before moving to Thailand, back in the 2000s. But since I moved here, I have dropped "real" motorbikes entirely, it's simply too dangerous and that's just one thing any biker needs to know when relocating here, either give up on biking or accept taking big risks.

I'm happy with my PCX 160, though it's a little bit small with a top box and a passenger. My next bike will probably be an ADV 350, which is a bit bigger, but that's as far as I will go.
 

  21 hours ago, AussieBob said:

If I was going to ride those roads, I would definitely use a 'real' bike (min 900ccs) and stay ahead of all the Thai crazies - but it would still be a negative - because instead of always watching for speed limits and cops with radar, I would be constantly watching for Somchais doing something stupid and/or dangerous.

Expand  

Exactly and in my opinion, it's simply too dangerous.

[cowslip]

  21 hours ago, AussieBob said:

Many years ago in Australia they combined the car and motorcycle licence into the one licence. They were both tested and verified separately, and you could get one and then get the other added. It makes sense to me that they should both be separate - you cannot combine a truck and car licence together - so why a bike and car.  I guess this might be a reason why some people who actually have a 'bike licence' but have not actually ridden a bike for decades, get into trouble quickly here in Thailand. 

Speaking of trouble. Has anyone else seen the youtube vid of some random that has been living in Thailand since 1991 stated that the best thing about Thailand is being able to ride his motorbike everywhere in the rural areas with freedom (I guess he means over the speed limits). I must say that it is so good to be able to drive in Thailand without the constant fear of a $300-$1000 fine for going 5-20Ks over the limit, and therefore no need to be constantly checking what the speed limit is. If I was going to ride those roads, I would definitely use a 'real' bike (min 900ccs) and stay ahead of all the Thai crazies - but it would still be a negative - because instead of always watching for speed limits and cops with radar, I would be constantly watching for Somchais doing something stupid and/or dangerous. Last time we were passed by 4 big bikes in a group - IMO that is the only way I would do it - and with loud exhausts so they can hear us coming.  

Expand  

Aussie licences are issued by individual states. Also Australia has not ratified the 1968 Vienna convention of road traffic.  It is quite possible an insurance company might decide not to cover someone in the event of an incident. (I had a QLD licence)

Unfortunately the lack of enforcement - e.g. speed limits is one of the factors for such a high death rate (75% of all road deaths) - it isn't "Thai crazies" that cause the deaths it is the lack of road safety practices that make the incidents more serious that causes the deaths. the elephant in te room is Thai first responders and emergency facilities