-
-
Latest Posts
-
46
Bets on whether Uncle Joe survives to run for President
What is it with you leftists being so behind the times. Don't you know yet that no real conservatives watch Fox anymore as Fox has exposed themselves as who they truly are . . . controlled opposition. The fact that they instructed Brett Baier to call Arizona early in 2020, way before it should or could have been called, in order to keep voters from going to the polls was the last straw for the thinking conservatives. Of course there are some few conservatives, just like 99% of Democrats, who don't think for themselves and swallow only what the talking heads tell them to swallow. Fox was an excellent cable news organization under Bill Ayers. But when the leftist, globalist, foreigner Rupert Murdoch took it over it has since been deliberately used as controlled opposition. Which was clearly evidenced when they put Trump-hater, RINO, uni-party, ex-Speaker of the House Paul Ryan on the board. Sean Hannity and Mark Levin are blowhards. There isn't a single Fox personality who is trustworthy as they all toe the line in order to not suffer the same fate as the only real truth teller they had, Tucker Carlson. If any of them truly had any values they would have quit in protest when Murdoch dumped Carlson as soon as Carlson started airing the J6 video that was released to him. Haven't seen any of that on Fox since, have you? Gee, I wonder why. So get up to speed. Posting just about anything from Fox to imply, "See, your own guys say . . . " is a fricking joke. Now that you know I expect you'll never again in the future post anything from Fox to suggest that these are "our guys." Unless, of course, you want to be dishonest. Hmmmm . . . -
46
Bets on whether Uncle Joe survives to run for President
I would have bet it was Hunter but after seeing the DOJ statement I’m starting to warm to the guy. -
46
Bets on whether Uncle Joe survives to run for President
You're either pulling my leg, Marc, or you're just plain stupid. I tend to think it's the later. And I'll explain my conclusion. The evidence has been posted. I even provided a screen shot of the transaction report. You see, Marc, you're stupid because you don't even know what the definition of evidence is. You're also corrupt and thoroughly dishonest because you understand that evidence may or may not constitute proof of a crime. In order to determine whether or not any evidence constitutes proof there first needs to be an investigation. There has not yet been an investigation into this particular piece of evidence because it's just been discovered. Now the reason you're thoroughly corrupt, dishonest, and a bad liar is because you've claimed that it's been investigated already, which is impossible. You're dishonest and deceptive because you want to fool people by linking this new evidence with all of the other evidence which has been investigated and has not been linked positively to criminality . . . yet, that is . . . and thereby imply that this new evidence already has been part of other investigations. Which, besides proving that you're dishonest and deceptive also proves, again, that you're just plain stupid if you can't understand that. More proof that you're a liar, and a consummate one at that since you lie constantly, is your initial claim here: That new evidence which has just come up was reported on over 19 months ago is another blatant lie of yours as it's an impossibility. Aside from being a consummate liar your constant use of fallacious logic which you use to support your juvenile and simpleton conclusions also shows that you're plain stupid because you're incapable of making a truly rational argument. But we all understand here. Being corrupt, dishonest, stupid, mentally challenged (as covered earlier) and a liar doesn't bother you in the least. You're actually quite proud that you possess these ignoble characteristics. Which makes you one sick individual as well. Now I don't know this for sure as, again, evidence does not necessarily constitute proof of anything, but the evidence that you defend Biden so vociferously, slavishly and mindlessly can be construed as evidence also that you suck Biden's stiff one regularly. Is it true? Enquiring minds would like to know. -
9
News Forum - Thailand’s tourism revenue falls short of annual target
Don’t enter Thailand at Bangkok Airports.Transit to Phuket or Chiang Mai etc.No Immigration Lines in Bangkok Airport Transit. I used the Fast Track at Bangkok before without challenge until they put a guard check there. -
9
News Forum - Thailand’s tourism revenue falls short of annual target
Don’t the criminal Russians have 60 Day Visa Waiver Entry ? Yet for all law- abiding Western countries it’s still only 30 Days ? Again a pure predictable money call. Thai Govt. know the Russians bring in and bank / invest vast sums of dirty money. Whereas the invested Westerners are not perhaps bringing in any new substantial sums. And any 60 day VE likely to instead result in the penniless western begpackers arriving in droves……
-
-
-
New Topics
-
-
-
Popular Now
-
-
-
Tell a friend
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.