Over 42,000 Adverse Reaction Reports Revealed In First Batch Of Pfizer Vax Docs

[Ttalk]

Directly from Pfizer docs themselves.  No member input or change of definitions, purely Pfizer's own data.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/over-42000-adverse-reaction-reports-revealed-first-batch-pfizer-vax-docs

 

"

The FDA's excruciatingly slow release of data related to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine has already borne fruit, and it's damning despite a trickle of just 500 pages per month out of 329,000 pages - which will take until 2076 to complete.

As first reported by Kyle Becker, there were a total of 42,086 case reports for adverse reactions (25,379 medically confirmed, 16,707 non-medically confirmed), spanning 158,893 total events.

More than 25,000 of the events were classified as "Nervous system disorders.""

 

 

[Lawyers_Guns_and_Money]

6 minutes ago, Ttalk said:

Directly from Pfizer docs themselves.  No member input or change of definitions, purely Pfizer's own data.

https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/over-42000-adverse-reaction-reports-revealed-first-batch-pfizer-vax-docs

"

The FDA's excruciatingly slow release of data related to Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine has already borne fruit, and it's damning despite a trickle of just 500 pages per month out of 329,000 pages - which will take until 2076 to complete.

As first reported by Kyle Becker, there were a total of 42,086 case reports for adverse reactions (25,379 medically confirmed, 16,707 non-medically confirmed), spanning 158,893 total events.

More than 25,000 of the events were classified as "Nervous system disorders.""

257 million Pfizer shots have been given in the US.  These adverse numbers represent .016% of shots given.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1198516/covid-19-vaccinations-administered-us-by-company/

[Ttalk]

6 minutes ago, Lawyers_Guns_and_Money said:

257 million Pfizer shots have been given in the US.  These adverse numbers represent .016% of shots given.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1198516/covid-19-vaccinations-administered-us-by-company/

Apparently you didn't see the part that this is from the initial early data.  This is not cumulative and they will not be releasing full data until 2076.  ""It is estimated that approximately [REDACTED] doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021," the document states." 

"Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events"...

 

India govt won't buy Pfizer, Moderna vaccines amid local output -sources

https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-govt-wont-buy-pfizer-moderna-vaccines-amid-local-output-sources-2021-09-21/

:The Indian government has also declined to meet the U.S. companies' requests for legal protection over any side-effects from the use of their shots, which are currently made only in the United States or Europe, two of the sources said."

 

 

Edited December 3, 2021 by Ttalk

[Lawyers_Guns_and_Money]

5 minutes ago, Ttalk said:

Apparently you didn't see the part that this is from the initial early data.  This is not cumulative and they will not be releasing full data until 2076.  ""It is estimated that approximately [REDACTED] doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the receipt of the first temporary authorisation for emergency supply on 01 December 2020 through 28 February 2021," the document states." 

"Cumulatively, through 28 February 2021, there was a total of 42,086 case reports (25,379 medically confirmed and 16,707 non-medically confirmed) containing 158,893 events"...

India govt won't buy Pfizer, Moderna vaccines amid local output -sources

https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-govt-wont-buy-pfizer-moderna-vaccines-amid-local-output-sources-2021-09-21/

:The Indian government has also declined to meet the U.S. companies' requests for legal protection over any side-effects from the use of their shots, which are currently made only in the United States or Europe, two of the sources said."

Okay...so what? There are side effects.  You can passive aggressively cherry pick information all you want to try to make a point that you just don't come out and say.  India didn't want to buy Pfizer because of legal issues, other countries did. So what? Somehow we are supposed to take India's decision as a "told ya so" verdict. Come on! 

[BlueSphinx]

26 minutes ago, Lawyers_Guns_and_Money said:

257 million Pfizer shots have been given in the US.  These adverse numbers represent .016% of shots given.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/1198516/covid-19-vaccinations-administered-us-by-company/

The data how many shots were administered during the first 3 months from vaccine roll-out (1 December 2020 till 28 Feb 2021) have been blacked out by the FDA in the first batch of Pfizer data they already released, as that figure is considered 'classified' (why???).  But that start of roll-out period already resulted in 42.000 adverse effect reports > the screenshot is coming straight from the Pfizer report. 

[El_Trauco]

A little background on the publisher of this information.

Wiki:

 

Zero Hedge (or ZeroHedge)^[b] is a far-right^[12] libertarian^[17] financial blog,^[13][14] presenting staff-written articles and aggregating news and opinions from external sources.^[18] Zero Hedge, per its motto,^[a] is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.^[22] While often labeled as a financial permabear,^[23][24] Zero Hedge has also been described as a source of "cutting-edge news, rumors and gossip in the financial industry".^[25]

Over time, Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial analysis,^[c] including conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric^[27] associated with the US radical right,^[14][28] the alt-right,^[29][30][31] and a pro-Russian bias.^{[1][32][33][34]} Zero Hedge's non-financial commentary has led to a number of site bans by various global social media platforms, although its 2019 Facebook ban^[35][36] and 2020 Twitter ban were later reversed.^[14][37]

Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.^[26]

 

[Freeduhdumb]

 

Only 500 pages after a FOIA lawsuit. 

1227 deaths by February reported.
These are Pfizer and FDA documents.

 

Looking at the amount of AE's recorded for the 42,000+ is jaw dropping.

What's worse, out of the recorded AE about 1:37 is the death ratio. 

The FDA admits these are only recorded AE that are considered above mild. There is so much more that hasn't been released yet...

 

Read for yourself...

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

 

[Freeduhdumb]

4 minutes ago, El_Trauco said:

A little background on the publisher of this information.

Wiki:

Zero Hedge (or ZeroHedge)^[b] is a far-right^[12] libertarian^[17] financial blog,^[13][14] presenting staff-written articles and aggregating news and opinions from external sources.^[18] Zero Hedge, per its motto,^[a] is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.^[22] While often labeled as a financial permabear,^[23][24] Zero Hedge has also been described as a source of "cutting-edge news, rumors and gossip in the financial industry".^[25]

Over time, Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial analysis,^[c] including conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric^[27] associated with the US radical right,^[14][28] the alt-right,^[29][30][31] and a pro-Russian bias.^{[1][32][33][34]} Zero Hedge's non-financial commentary has led to a number of site bans by various global social media platforms, although its 2019 Facebook ban^[35][36] and 2020 Twitter ban were later reversed.^[14][37]

Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.^[26]

It's about the message not the messenger... more typical Ad Hominem attacks, obfuscating the the information. 

 

Ad hominem

Ad hominem, short for argumentum ad hominem, refers to several types of arguments, some but not all of which are fallacious. Typically this term refers to a rhetorical strategy where the speaker attacks the character, motive, or some other attribute of the person making an argument rather than attacking the substance of the argument itself.

 

 

Edited December 3, 2021 by Freeduhdumb
Grammar correction additional content.

[El_Trauco]

You're accusing Wiki of an ad hominem attack?

You have an obligation to vet your sources.

 An ad hominem can be valid.

Wiki:

Valid ad hominem arguments occur in informal logic, where the person making the argument relies on arguments from authority such as testimony, expertise, or on a selective presentation of information supporting the position they are advocating. In this case, counter-arguments may be made that the target is dishonest, lacks the claimed expertise, or has a conflict of interest. Another type of valid ad hominem argument generally only encountered in specialized philosophical usage refers to the dialectical strategy of using the target's own beliefs and arguments against them, while not agreeing with the validity of those beliefs and arguments.

Get it?

 

Edited December 3, 2021 by El_Trauco
Faraday

[Faraday]

1 minute ago, El_Trauco said:

You're accusing Wiki of an ad hominem attack?

You have an obligation to vet your sources.

 An ad hominem can be valid.

Valid ad hominem arguments occur in informal logic, where the person making the argument relies on arguments from authority such as testimony, expertise, or on a selective presentation of information supporting the position they are advocating. In this case, counter-arguments may be made that the target is dishonest, lacks the claimed expertise, or has a conflict of interest. Another type of valid ad hominem argument generally only encountered in specialized philosophical usage refers to the dialectical strategy of using the target's own beliefs and arguments against them, while not agreeing with the validity of those beliefs and arguments.

Get it?

You didn't put the link that shows that came from Wiki, you naughty boy!

[El_Trauco]

5 minutes ago, Faraday said:

You didn't put the link that shows that came from Wiki, you naughty boy!

There, fixed it for you.

[BlueSphinx]

4 minutes ago, El_Trauco said:

A little background on the publisher of this information.

Wiki:

Zero Hedge (or ZeroHedge)^[b] is a far-right^[12] libertarian^[17] financial blog,^[13][14] presenting staff-written articles and aggregating news and opinions from external sources.^[18] Zero Hedge, per its motto,^[a] is bearish in its investment outlook and analysis, often deriving from its adherence to the Austrian School of economics and credit cycles.^[22] While often labeled as a financial permabear,^[23][24] Zero Hedge has also been described as a source of "cutting-edge news, rumors and gossip in the financial industry".^[25]

Over time, Zero Hedge expanded into non-financial analysis,^[c] including conspiracy theories and fringe rhetoric^[27] associated with the US radical right,^[14][28] the alt-right,^[29][30][31] and a pro-Russian bias.^{[1][32][33][34]} Zero Hedge's non-financial commentary has led to a number of site bans by various global social media platforms, although its 2019 Facebook ban^[35][36] and 2020 Twitter ban were later reversed.^[14][37]

Zero Hedge in-house content is posted under the pseudonym "Tyler Durden"; the founder and main editor was identified as Daniel Ivandjiiski.^[26]

You don't have to agree or go along with everything ZeroHedge publishes - I surely don't.  Unfortunately it seems they are the only ones to bring out this story.   The mainstream media are simply not interested in publishing the slowly released data from the Pfizer-submitted report on the basis of which the FDA approved the further roll-out of the Pfizer vaccine.  It took the FDA approx 200 days to 'meticulously screen and review' the report and provide the emergency approval for the roll-out, but it will take them 55 years (!) to make all the data public on which they based their decision.  And if that first tiny batch of released data already contains such bombshells as the screenshot from the Pfizer-report I understand the FDA's hesitation in providing transparency.  

Don't shoot the messenger but look at the factual data they provide, or are you implying that ZeroHedge has altered the Pfizer-report screenshot?

[El_Trauco]

This is the FOIA thread?

The plaintiff's in this FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) case have requested all  329,000 pages of data in regards this study.

Perhaps had they been more specific in their request the timeline could be shorter.

Study data includes:

Patient Identifiers

Proprietary manufacturing data

These need to be stripped (redacted) in order to protect valid concerns and are legally mandated by Congress.

Here's the court document:

https://www.sirillp.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/020-Second-Joint-Status-Report-8989f1fed17e2d919391d8df1978006e.pdf

Now if you wouldn't mind your personal medical data being published online for all to see. Then good on you. Others may have a different position.

 

[Ttalk]

Here's a great breakdown from Chris at peakprosperity about the FOIA request for Pfizer's data.  Just 1200 dead, I wonder why Pfizer wouldn't want this data out there?