News Forum - Good Morning Thailand | End of the curfew? Anutin defends vaccine rollout | September 2

[Thaiger]

Ending the nightly curfew in “dark red” provinces is under consideration – a passing comment from the PM Prayut Chan-o-cha yesterday. Minister of Public Health Anutin has responded in defence of himself and in praise of the government’s apparently competent handling of the Covid-19 crisis. Police have taken into custody 2 suspects accused of beating a 23 year old coffee shop employee in Si Racha in Chon Buri on Monday. Watch out, ‘Mu’, a new Covid-19 variant that may be resistant to vaccines, is making headlines as a new “variant of interest” according to the World Health Organisation.

The post Good Morning Thailand | End of the curfew? Anutin defends vaccine rollout | September 2 appeared first on Thaiger News.

Read the full story

[vlad]

Will you Khun Anutin tell the people of Thailand what vaccine you and your PM was administered with ?? and inform them why you are still buying a very expensive vaccine that has a poor percentage rate against the Delta strain.

[gummy]

Just now, vlad said:

Will you Khun Anutin tell the people of Thailand what vaccine you and your PM was administered with ?? and inform them why you are still buying a very expensive vaccine that has a poor percentage rate against the Delta strain.

Well more to the point, when did his friends and cronies 1st receive their vax ? Bet it was well ahead of the rest of the population 99.9% who were more at risk due to age and/or underlying health problems then they were.

[Bob20]

9 minutes ago, gummy said:

Well more to the point, when did his friends and cronies 1st receive their vax ? Bet it was well ahead of the rest of the population 99.9% who were more at risk due to age and/or underlying health problems then they were.

Plus, if they tell you, would you believe them?

[gummy]

2 minutes ago, Bob20 said:

Plus, if they tell you, would you believe them?

Possibly if they said between 18th Nov 2020 and 24th Dec 2020 I actually would.

[Bob20]

4 minutes ago, gummy said:

Possibly if they said between 18th Nov 2020 and 24th Dec 2020 I actually would.

Sure, but that's not what they are going to say

 

[gummy]

Just now, Bob20 said:

Sure, but that's not what they are going to say

Possibly not but you said "Plus, if they tell you, would you believe them?" so I just quoted dates that should they confirm I would have believed them. 

[colinneil]

46 minutes ago, Thaiger said:

Anutin has responded in defence of himself and in praise of the government’s apparently competent handling of the Covid-19 crisis.

BIGGEST load of hogwash i have seen in a while, governments apparent competent handling, nearly peed myself reading that nonsense.

A more incompetent/ useless load of idiots would be almost impossible to find.

[Bob20]

1 minute ago, gummy said:

Possibly not but you said "Plus, if they tell you, would you believe them?" so I just quoted dates that should they confirm I would have believed them. 

I know Got out the wrong side of the bed today? Or stressed from arguing online? You seem more irritable today.

[gummy]

Just now, colinneil said:

BIGGEST load of hogwash i have seen in a while, governments apparent competent handling, nearly peed myself reading that nonsense.

A more incompetent/ useless load of idiots would be almost impossible to find.

Well when it comes to lies and self praise isn't Thailand the Hub of it ?

[colinneil]

Just now, Bob20 said:

I know Got out the wrong side of the bed today? Or stressed from arguing online? You seem more irritable today.

Takes 2 to tango, both of you are doing exactly the same, you know pot..... kettle black.

[Bob20]

1 minute ago, colinneil said:

Takes 2 to tango, both of you are doing exactly the same, you know pot..... kettle black.

It's called....

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/irony

[gummy]

1 minute ago, Bob20 said:

I know Got out the wrong side of the bed today? Or stressed from arguing online? You seem more irritable today.

Not at all, just answered a question you put to us literally. Now had you have asked the question "Would I believe anything that the government say" that would have received a different reply no doubt.

But just to ensure 100% clarity this is what I said

Well more to the point, when did his friends and cronies 1st receive their vax ? Bet it was well ahead of the rest of the population 99.9% 

Your reply was

"Plus, if they tell you, would you believe them?"

To which I responded

"Possibly if they said between 18th Nov 2020 and 24th Dec 2020 I actually would."

 

So getting out of the wrong side of the bed is just your misinterpretation of my reply or else a defensive comment for asking the wrong question initially.

 

 

[Bob20]

5 minutes ago, gummy said:

Not at all, just answered a question you put to us literally. Now had you have asked the question "Would I believe anything that the government say" that would have received a different reply no doubt.

But just to ensure 100% clarity this is what I said

Well more to the point, when did his friends and cronies 1st receive their vax ? Bet it was well ahead of the rest of the population 99.9% 

Your reply was

"Plus, if they tell you, would you believe them?"

To which I responded

"Possibly if they said between 18th Nov 2020 and 24th Dec 2020 I actually would."

So getting out of the wrong side of the bed is just your misinterpretation of my reply or else a defensive comment for asking the wrong question initially.

Never mind.

I can read, I just notice a different tone in your messages, actually continued in this last reply.

Have a cuppa. Not arguing. It was meant ironically from the start.

 

[gummy]

1 minute ago, Bob20 said:

Never mind.

I can read, I just notice a different tone in your messages, actually continued in this last reply.

Have a cuppa. Not arguing. It was meant ironically from the start.

Agreed, sometime it is understanding the simple statements that escape people isn't it ?

[Rain]

1 hour ago, gummy said:

Well more to the point, when did his friends and cronies 1st receive their vax ? Bet it was well ahead of the rest of the population 99.9% who were more at risk due to age and/or underlying health problems then they were.

Well, you can bet on that. The principle practice of plutocracies. Any actions have little to do with the people.