News Forum - Bomb blitz rocks southern Thailand: Seven injured

[Thaiger]

A series of bomb blasts sent shockwaves through Sungai Padi district, in the southern province of Narathiwat province this morning, leaving seven security personnel injured and sparking concerns about the region’s escalating unrest. The attacks began just before dawn, with bombs planted strategically near power poles outside a gas factory in Kuwa Village, according to … …

The story Bomb blitz rocks southern Thailand: Seven injured as seen on Thaiger News.

Read the full story

[AussieBob]

Amazing - not one word in the story about Muslims or Islam. Seems even in Thailand it is not allowed to accuse radical Muslims of committing blatant acts of terrorism.  Not sure what the solution is down there, but from what I have seen in my over 6 decades here on this planet, if Thailand gives the Malay-Muslims the southern regions, some years later they will want more. 

[Khunmark]

3 hours ago, AussieBob said:

Amazing - not one word in the story about Muslims or Islam. Seems even in Thailand it is not allowed to accuse radical Muslims of committing blatant acts of terrorism.  Not sure what the solution is down there, but from what I have seen in my over 6 decades here on this planet, if Thailand gives the Malay-Muslims the southern regions, some years later they will want more. 

That’s because it’s a news story, and NOT speculation. Responsible journalism dictates that the story is covered as the facts are presented, no matter how great the likelihood of a certain outcome of events. If want accusations perhaps you should consider reading anti Muslim editorials to feed your righteousness.

[Skip]

9 hours ago, Khunmark said:

That’s because it’s a news story, and NOT speculation. Responsible journalism dictates that the story is covered as the facts are presented, no matter how great the likelihood of a certain outcome of events. If want accusations perhaps you should consider reading anti Muslim editorials to feed your righteousness.

So you prefer to bury your head in the sand rather than expose the evil in the world...?

[Smiler]

11 hours ago, Khunmark said:

That’s because it’s a news story, and NOT speculation. Responsible journalism dictates that the story is covered as the facts are presented, no matter how great the likelihood of a certain outcome of events. If want accusations perhaps you should consider reading anti Muslim editorials to feed your righteousness.

Perhaps the perpetrators were Buddhist? or Christians? or Hindu? or Athiests? or …. Oh wait???? 

[Khunmark]

2 hours ago, Skip said:

So you prefer to bury your head in the sand rather than expose the evil in the world...?

I prefer not to work myself into a lather because the word Muslim didn’t crop up in a news story about a bombing in southern Thailand penned by a Thethaiger journalist.

 

41 minutes ago, Smiler said:

Perhaps the perpetrators were Buddhist? or Christians? or Hindu? or Athiests? or …. Oh wait???

It’s a frivolous thing to be outraged over. But in an age where outrage is the spirit of the times, it’s not surprising. If you want to bleat about the omission of a word- feel free. It’s just not moving the needle for me.

[Marc26]

15 hours ago, Skip said:

So you prefer to bury your head in the sand rather than expose the evil in the world...?

What is the article supposed to say?

 

It it almost assuredly Muslim separatists that did it 

 

But if they don't know for sure right away 

What would they write?

 

" It is probably Muslim separatists "