News Forum - Chaiyaphum province mobilises aid for Thai labourers in Israel amid escalating conflict

[oldschooler]

On 10/16/2023 at 9:11 AM, TheDirtyDurian said:

Can you show me a post of mine where I have justified, glorified, or supported anything that Hamas have done?

You haven’t condemned Hamas systematic planned murder & mutilation of children though have you ? 

[TheDirtyDurian]

4 minutes ago, oldschooler said:

Haven’t read your posts. I just said IF you or anyone were not supporting free civilised Israel against crazed Hamas savages then that’s taken rightly as supporting Hamas. Impossible to be “impartial” in such cases like idiotic BBC claim for example. “not supporting” needs to be “ condemning” hamas mass systematic mutilation, abuse & murder of children.

So if you haven't read any posts of mine how do you know what I think of whom I support??

And in a previous post you said:

"Even if you haven’t you do at least give that impression with “ fence- sitting” and “ both sides” stuff."

So how do you get that impression not reading a post of mine

[oldschooler]

Just now, TheDirtyDurian said:

So if you haven't read any posts of mine how do you know what I think of whom I support??

And in a previous post you said:

"Even if you haven’t you do at least give that impression with “ fence- sitting” and “ both sides” stuff."

So how do you get that impression not reading a post of mine

From others here I respect  criticising you in far worse terms ! On reflection you are not “ neutral” but appear more a closet jihadi supporter / anti - Semite by “ not condemning “ murder of children. 

[TheDirtyDurian]

4 minutes ago, oldschooler said:

You haven’t condemned Hamas systematic planned murder & mutilation of children though have you ? 

So anonymous strangers on t'internet have to conform to your expectations?

You're conflating two things where no connection exists. 

[oldschooler]

43 minutes ago, TheDirtyDurian said:

So anonymous strangers on t'internet have to conform to your expectations?

You're conflating two things where no connection exists. 

No I thought not 

[TheDirtyDurian]

20 minutes ago, oldschooler said:

No I thought not 

You don't do you.

[ChicagoExpat]

19 hours ago, TheDirtyDurian said:

Please provide a post where I've said I support Hamas.

DegenerateDurian, at some point it might occur to you to wonder why, if you don't ACTUALLY support Hamas, you've somehow given everyone on this forum the impression that you do.

You write repeatedly things like "You read into my posts what you want" but at some point responsibility for any misunderstanding lies also with the speaker, not only the hearer.

I also note that despite this clear misunderstanding, you only say things like "Show me where I said I support Hamas" rather than just saying something like, "I totally reject and condemn Hamas and their mass murder, even if I do not support many of the Israeli government's actions toward Palestinians."
 

So until you actually condemn Hamas, we all (correctly) assume you support them.

[ChicagoExpat]

10 hours ago, TheDirtyDurian said:

So anonymous strangers on t'internet have to conform to your expectations?

You're conflating two things where no connection exists. 

Love it!  Yes, you support Hamas unless you state you don't.

Vile.

[TheDirtyDurian]

4 hours ago, ChicagoExpat said:

Love it!  Yes, you support Hamas unless you state you don't.

Vile.

So to extend your logic, I must like everything unless I say I don't .

I don't believe I've expressed an opinion on Marmite on this forum.

So I must like it right?

[ChicagoExpat]

45 minutes ago, TheDirtyDurian said:

So to extend your logic, I must like everything unless I say I don't .

I don't believe I've expressed an opinion on Marmite on this forum.

So I must like it right?

If you argue over many days against those who hate it, posting dubious graphics from pro-Marmite groups, steadfastly refusing to say that you hate it despite being asked... it will eventually become a reasonable assumption, yes, that you do indeed love it!

[TheDirtyDurian]

25 minutes ago, ChicagoExpat said:

If you argue over many days against those who hate it, posting dubious graphics from pro-Marmite groups, steadfastly refusing to say that you hate it despite being asked... it will eventually become a reasonable assumption, yes, that you do indeed love it!

dubious graphics from UN figures you mean?

From world media group?

Was that the ones?

[TheDirtyDurian]

I argued for truth in what people say. 

When people make spurious claims about beheaded babies and present that as fact. Getting whole world agitated

Then later, people say that actually it didn't matter that what they said wasn't true, irrelevant.

[TheDirtyDurian]

30 minutes ago, ChicagoExpat said:

If you argue over many days against those who hate it, posting dubious graphics from pro-Marmite groups, steadfastly refusing to say that you hate it despite being asked... it will eventually become a reasonable assumption, yes, that you do indeed love it!

And the pro-Vegemite??

[ChicagoExpat]

15 hours ago, TheDirtyDurian said:

dubious graphics from UN figures you mean?

From world media group?

Was that the ones?

Yes, for the reasons I pointed out -- which I note you never address.

[ChicagoExpat]

15 hours ago, TheDirtyDurian said:

I argued for truth in what people say. 

When people make spurious claims about beheaded babies and present that as fact. Getting whole world agitated

Then later, people say that actually it didn't matter that what they said wasn't true, irrelevant.

This is awesome coming from the guy who consistently repeatedly posted crap from al-Jazeera.

[ChicagoExpat]

15 hours ago, TheDirtyDurian said:

And the pro-Vegemite??

Those people are just fine.  It's the pro-Marmite people that need to go.  I'm going to post a graphic from an extremely authoritative source that's not biased in the least, than purports to prove my point.  It will measure the sodium in Marmite versus the carbohydrates in Vegemite in a colorful chart; if anyone points out that I am using two different standards to measure the quality of the two, I will ignore their legitimate objections and instead post the graphic all the more and ask them, how DARE you question my extremely authoritative source, that's not biased in the least?

[TheDirtyDurian]

10 hours ago, ChicagoExpat said:

Yes, for the reasons I pointed out -- which I note you never address.

Coz there's nothing to address.

On the one hand we have a world renowned media organisation, and on the other some random guy on t'internet....

[TheDirtyDurian]

10 hours ago, ChicagoExpat said:

This is awesome coming from the guy who consistently repeatedly posted crap from al-Jazeera.

Thanks. Glad you've finally recognised my awesomeness..

Cheers bud. Have a nice day!

[TheDirtyDurian]

10 hours ago, ChicagoExpat said:

Those people are just fine.  It's the pro-Marmite people that need to go.  I'm going to post a graphic from an extremely authoritative source that's not biased in the least, than purports to prove my point.  It will measure the sodium in Marmite versus the carbohydrates in Vegemite in a colorful chart; if anyone points out that I am using two different standards to measure the quality of the two, I will ignore their legitimate objections and instead post the graphic all the more and ask them, how DARE you question my extremely authoritative source, that's not biased in the least?

What about the jam though?