News Forum - British man recounts shocking encounter with racist Russians in Phuket

[Karolyn]

I will repeat this, 'Kievan Rus'. Thus  Kiev/Ukraine is appropriate for inclusion, in a Russian ethnostate. Like Manchester and Lobdon are in England, Berlin and Frankfurt, are in Germany, etc. 

[TWS60]

On 10/5/2023 at 10:09 PM, HolyCowCm said:

Being a musician, if I was doing a set and was not allowed to finish it then I would be p i zzzd off a bit. But for canned music out of a box, nope. Would just make me leave, go have a drink somewhere else, roll one up and toke away. 

I dig your attitude. 

[ChicagoExpat]

On 10/8/2023 at 7:26 AM, Karolyn said:

I will repeat this, 'Kievan Rus'. Thus  Kiev/Ukraine is appropriate for inclusion, in a Russian ethnostate. Like Manchester and Lobdon are in England, Berlin and Frankfurt, are in Germany, etc. 

Absolutely unfreaking believable how much you just read off the Kremlin talking points.  Ukraine is NOT "appropriate for inclusion" in Russia.

God, it's like listening to Goebbels or Hitler saying how the rest of Europe is appropriate for Lebensraum.

Get this through your head, Slavaboo -- neither Ukraine, nor the Baltic States, nor Moldova, nor Poland, nor Georgia, nor any other country are "appropriate for inclusion" in a "Russian ethnostate" -- they are free and independent countries that, having seen the tender mercies of the Russia jackboot firsthand, want nothing to do with being included in a new Russian empire.

[cowslip]

3 hours ago, ChicagoExpat said:

Thus  Kiev/Ukraine is appropriate for inclusion, in a Russian ethnostate.

Last time that statement was used it was Adolf justifying annexation of places like Czechaslovakia....Austria etc

 

The USA would have to be dissolved...

[Karolyn]

3 minutes ago, cowslip said:

Last time that statement was used it was Adolf justifying annexation of places like Czechaslovakia....Austria etc

The USA would have to be dissolved...

Well you never see the US hand the land back to the Indians

[ChicagoExpat]

39 minutes ago, Karolyn said:

Well you never see the US hand the land back to the Indians

Actually, we have.  Tribes have sovereignty over their lands.  It's not a perfect system but it's better than what most countries have done.  Do try to keep up.

And, since you're such a Russia fan, when will Russia hand back its territory to the hundreds of nations it conquered to become an 11 time zone nation?

But this is all irrelevant, as you knew it would be.  We're discussing your statement that Russia has the right to annex other countries er, sorry, that other countries are APPROPRIATE FOR INCLUSION in Russia.  Can we return to that?  I'd love to hear you discuss this more.  Here's the challenge:  Try to refrain from using the same words used by the Nazis, the Soviets, or the Japanese in the 30s and 40s.

It won't be easy but you can do it, Leni Rienfenstahl er Karolyn!

[cowslip]

50 minutes ago, Karolyn said:

Well you never see the US hand the land back to the Indians

"Indians"? - What are you trying to conclude from that in relation to Russia and Ukraine?

[PhuketBloke]

There must be a lot of Americans using this site as the subject is about a British guy in Thailand but it has been highjacked and turned into the usual boring story of USA hate towards the Russians. 

I know one thing about the Russians if it was not for the sacrifice of tens of millions of their soldiers the whole of Europe would be speaking German now. 

 

[PhuketBloke]

I may as well go with the flow of the current discussion on the talk of invasion.

Which country was it that invaded an Asian country with its huge military might, killed two million civilians over a few decades then did a runner when it got tough? 

[Rookiescot]

3 hours ago, Karolyn said:

Well you never see the US hand the land back to the Indians

So Russian imperialism is OK?

[Rookiescot]

14 minutes ago, PhuketBloke said:

I may as well go with the flow of the current discussion on the talk of invasion.

Which country was it that invaded an Asian country with its huge military might, killed two million civilians over a few decades then did a runner when it got tough? 

OK I give in. Which country did that? Japan? China?

[cowslip]

23 minutes ago, PhuketBloke said:

the whole of Europe would be speaking German now. 

Interesting spin on an old cliche

[PhuketBloke]

12 minutes ago, cowslip said:

Interesting spin on an old cliche

I was not referring to the Alice in Wonderland version of history. 

[cowslip]

1 hour ago, PhuketBloke said:

I was not referring to the Alice in Wonderland version of history. 

I suspect you aren't a historian.

just becuse you live in the past, doesn't make you an "expert" (not my word) on history.

[Khunmark]

2 hours ago, PhuketBloke said:

There must be a lot of Americans using this site as the subject is about a British guy in Thailand but it has been highjacked and turned into the usual boring story of USA hate towards the Russians. 

I know one thing about the Russians if it was not for the sacrifice of tens of millions of their soldiers the whole of Europe would be speaking German now. 

Parallels between the eastern front and the present situation in Ukraine too. Russia have reverted back to the military tactics that works best for them- the grind. What they lack in tactical prowess they make up for with boots on the ground. They’re in for the long haul.

[PhuketBloke]

On 10/10/2023 at 6:49 PM, cowslip said:

I suspect you aren't a historian.

just becuse you live in the past, doesn't make you an "expert" (not my word) on history.

I am not a doctor but I know what a cold is.

And why is mentioning a historical fact the same as living in the past, I was born well after WW2.

I know of Oliver Cromwell etc but that does not mean I live in the 1600's.

Russian soldiers killed in WW2, about 11 million, USA 420,000 but that included Asia where most of the American deaths took place. 

The Brits and the Americans were in Europe just to do a bit of mopping up after the Russians had more or less defeated Germany on their own.

Now when it comes to the USA and WW2 in Asia they did indeed do the majority of the fighting and it is where they lost the majority of their men. 

 

[ChicagoExpat]

On 10/10/2023 at 4:58 PM, PhuketBloke said:

I may as well go with the flow of the current discussion on the talk of invasion.

Which country was it that invaded an Asian country with its huge military might, killed two million civilians over a few decades then did a runner when it got tough? 

I LOVE your take on this -- that since people aren't praising the Russians for using racial slurs on this guy, it's just the same old Russophobia at work!

Spoken like a true consumer of Kremlin agitprop.

So, to answer your question above... Russia.  Russia answers your question perfectly.  They invaded Afghanistan to prop up their puppet, killed up to 2 million civilians, and then ran.  Here's a link for the 2 million civilians figure: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet–Afghan_War#:~:text=The conflict led to the,in Pakistan and in Iran.

Not what you wanted, was it?  Because it your rush to dump hate on America (who invaded to dislodge Osama bin Laden -- unless you're a jihadi or just so far leftwing hard to see how you can whine about that), you totally botched the casualty figures.  These two left-wing sites estimate 46,000-70,000 TOTAL -- most of were killed by the Taliban, or course.  And, failed effort though it was, the U.S. spent hundreds of billions trying to build schools, highways, infrastructure, etc. while your good friends the Russians just killed, and killed, and killed.  All to prop up a commie puppet.

[cowslip]

57 minutes ago, PhuketBloke said:

And why is mentioning a historical fact the same as living in the past, I

You're not a historian either. - THere you have it - you don't know what a fact is or what to do with one if you had one.

[Vigo]

On 10/10/2023 at 2:52 AM, Karolyn said:

Well you never see the US hand the land back to the Indians

Are you aware that the USA  has "Tribal Lands?" The  native peoples have jurisdiction over their land. It is why there can be casinos in states that do not allow gambling.

Have you ever heard of the Navajo Nation? 400,000 people strong. It occupies and controls a massive portion of 3 US states. https://www.navajo-nsn.gov/   Are you aware that  state and county laws do not apply to such nations? Have you heard of Cherokee nation?  Try going onto tribal lands without an invitation and see what happens. 

 

[cowslip]

39 minutes ago, Vigo said:

Are you aware that the USA  has "Tribal Lands?" The  native peoples have jurisdiction over their land. It is why there can be casinos in states that do not allow gambling.

Have you ever heard of the Navajo Nation? 400,000 people strong. It occupies and controls a massive portion of 3 US states. https://www.navajo-nsn.gov/   Are you aware that  state and county laws do not apply to such nations? Have you heard of Cherokee nation?  Try going onto tribal lands without an invitation and see what happens. 

Karolyn is a troll - or has several thinking impairments. He makes all sort of bizarre claims

[Guest1]

39 minutes ago, cowslip said:

Karolyn is a troll - or has several thinking impairments. He makes all sort of bizarre claims

She, I think.

[cowslip]

50 minutes ago, Guest1 said:

She, I think.

Yes - but I don't think

[Karolyn]

3 hours ago, cowslip said:

Karolyn is a troll - or has several thinking impairments. He makes all sort of bizarre claims

Are you liberal by any chance? I usually get trouble only from US type liberals, or from 'cuckservatives'. I nrver get criticism from socialists, anarchists, or what not, nor from nationalists, libertarians, US constitutionalists. etc. 

[cowslip]

10 minutes ago, Karolyn said:

Are you liberal by any chance? I usually get trouble only from US type liberals, or from 'cuckservatives'. I nrver get criticism from socialists, anarchists, or what not, nor from nationalists, libertarians, US constitutionalists. etc. 

Really doesn't deserve an answer deos it?

 

however what I do that you don't is use reason, logic and critical thinking.

[Vigo]

1 hour ago, Karolyn said:

Are you liberal by any chance? I usually get trouble only from US type liberals, or from 'cuckservatives'. I nrver get criticism from socialists, anarchists, or what not, nor from nationalists, libertarians, US constitutionalists. etc. 

Aren't you you usually in conflict with people who do not agree with your views on adults having sexual relationships with children?