Nice to hear an alternative viewpoint for once, much of the media seems to have forgotten that old maxim - I may diagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it (originally something to do with Voltaire, apparently).
You really are having touble coming to grasp with this, aren't you?
You make ridiculous assumptions and seem to think they are facts - what the hell do you think "sovereignty" is? - Apart from flat-earth's cousin?
Point out the specific assumptions which you deem ridiculous and we can go from there to try to see whose reasoning is valid and whose is not. As I said, there is nothing, no conclusion is ever drawn, that is without reason. Although not all reasoning leads to a true and accurate reflection of bedrock reality.
Now we should at least start by agreeing on the definition of terms. I'll begin with the definition of sovereign.
1) a person who has supreme power or authority.
2) a group or body of persons or a state having sovereign authority.
Does that definition agree with you? If not, then define it for yourself.