No worries, you're just projecting your insecurities onto a dead guy who can't answer, which is the only way you can score a faux victory and feel good about yourself on the internet. Liife is hard. I understand. You need a hug.
Do you screw up simple things often? 60 to 30? Really? What do you do for an encore, gargle peanut butter whilst doing your best Kissinger voice impression for soi dogs in front of 7-11?
I would have to disagree, Vigo, based on the idea that there can never be justification for criminal acts. The means never justify the ends. The idea of sacrificing lives for the "greater good" or avoiding a greater evil being workable is, in my opinion, an utter fallacy. To affirm the truth of the above one only needs to ask themselves whether they would still agree with the idea of the means justifying the ends if the sacrifice of lives were to include themselves and their loved ones. If you find yourself protesting over the idea of becoming a sacrificial lamb, or a necessary casualty of war, or . . . what's the softened PC term governments like to use? . . . an acceptable loss, then you're ready to reconsider your statement as valid.
So Schwab is a Kissinger protege and the WEF is a puppet organization for the council on foreign relations. Harvard is also a recruiting center for the CIA.
Here are some nice old pictures:
To make it a bit more spicy
Title by Reuters: ‘Henry Kissinger, American diplomat and Nobel winner, dead at 100’…
I would change the title as: HENRY KISSINGER, WAR CRIMINAL, DEAD AT 100…
AND EVEN ADD: War criminal and Nobel Peace Prize recipient! Because in our clown world, those two things are not mutually exclusive… Yep they gave it to Obama… (LOL! Even if Obama apologized for 1 civilian drone victim every day, it would take him 3 years)…
Here’s a long documentary about the trials of Kissinger:
I guess there’s a limit to how long the adrenochrome will keep these zombies upright.
Now who is next? Soros? Or even Kissinger’s protege WEF’s Klaus Schwab?
In the meantime Kissinger, I hope you enjoy your new “tropical” location…
I watched the video and it was well balanced. It certainly contained damning documented facts against Kissinger which I don't think any acolytes of Kissinger here can deny as to their truth.
Perhaps what struck me most was a quote from Kissinger at a Sept. '70 meeting with President Nixon on the Chilean election victory of Allende.
Kissinger: I don't see why we need to stand by and see a country go communist due to the irresponsibility of its people.
Yes, it's quite sad that people are in a position to choose their own leaders. Leaders are best selected by politicians and unelected political figures working on behalf of corporate interests (AT&T and Coca Cola) who return the favours by funneling money to their reelection campaigns.
Pinochet turned out to be a much better choice for Chileans than Allende, true?
I find it interesting, BlueSphinx, that the responses from a couple of posters are nothing more than diatribes with little to zero content addressing the actual topic. Perhaps they're intellectually challenged and are capable of only coarse slurs and ridicule?
Pinetree, TWS60, McTavish . . . do you guys have any intelligent thoughts to counter what appear to be many quite legitimate charges against Kissinger? Or is the extent of your input only to huff and puff like blowhards?
How accurate are your sentiments when put under scrutiny, Pinetree?