News Forum - Prince Harry’s admiration for Jeremy Corbyn vilified by British establishment

[Thaiger]

The vilification of Prince Harry and his wife Meghan Markle by the British tabloids continues to gather pace on the back of a new book written by the Duke of Sussex with the revelation that he backed former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn. Led by the Daily Mail, which has a particular axe to grind after the High Court in London last year found them guilty of libelling the royal couple, the British tabloid provides hateful updates on Harry and Meghan on an almost hourly basis. Last month Prince Harry and Princess Meghan faced a storm of animosity from the […]

The story Prince Harry’s admiration for Jeremy Corbyn vilified by British establishment as seen on Thaiger News.

Read the full story

[Shade_Wilder]

What can you say?

It makes me proud to not be British!

55555555555555!

[Richard1944]

First of all who ever wrote this article has no clue, Corbyn was a hardened communist and globalist his loyalty was to communism and the globalists who want to dominate the world , is also very doubtful if Harry and Megan are around anymore

[Dedinbed]

4 hours ago, Thaiger said:

a new book written by the Duke of Sussex with the revelation that he backed former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn

If getting hitched to a fluttering , whining , cynical , hypocritical , self serving , ladder climber wasn't enough to disconnect him from swathes of the Brit' population then his " backing " for communist Gerbil Jeremy should go a long way to finalising a divorce from the rest .. 

[Pinetree]

5 hours ago, Thaiger said:

the British tabloid provides hateful updates on Harry and Meghan on an almost hourly basis.

Thaiger; don't you mean helpful?  Just stop your political commentary and stick to facts, not  using incendiary words that alienate many of your members.  

[JohninDublin]

4 hours ago, Richard1944 said:

First of all who ever wrote this article has no clue, Corbyn was a hardened communist and globalist his loyalty was to communism and the globalists who want to dominate the world , is also very doubtful if Harry and Megan are around anymore

I think you should google "Was Corbyn A Globalist", and you will find plenty of evidence that he wasn't.

[JohninDublin]

I've always been of the opinion that those who spend so much time fixating on the Royals really need to get a hobby.

So he liked Corbyn. Anyone noticed a pattern in recent years?

2016 Trump or Clinton

2017 May or Corbyn

2019 Corbyn or Johnson

2020 Trump or Biden

I am not going to say who was the better candidate, but history shows us that that these were effectively the choices that people were faced with, and there were plenty of reasons for the voters to say, "Is this the best we can come up with?" 

[Grumpish]

Don't know about the Establishment, but most other people seem to be starting to realise that he just another whiny little brat with mummy issues.

[Soidog]

I feel sorry for Harry in as much that he found Megan Markell. He was and remains a disturbed and insecure soul and understandably so. His mother was killed when he was very young in the full glare of the worlds media. Unfortunately for Harry, he found someone who deliberately, or by chance, played to those insecurities. 
 

All of this would be bad enough if they were taking place in a normal family. However, this is being played out on the world stage. Harry continues to criticise the very institution he continues to use to make millions from. He demands to hold on to certain Royal privileges while criticising the very institution he bemoans. He confuses in his mind the Royal family and the Royal institution.

I did think that when he left his Royal duties (it’s a job not a family role) he would head off with his new wife and live a quiet peaceful and happy life. Instead, his delusional disorder continues to grow. I can’t help but feel this is fuelled by Megan who see all of this as a way to raise her profile, become the global mega star she always longed for during her acting career and Harry is caught up in it due to him falling in love with her. It’s all rather sad for everyone. Harry thinks his mother would be proud of him. I actually think the rift he has with his brother would make her turn in her grave. Very sad all round and I wish they would all back off and find happiness. Life is too short…

[Rookiescot]

2 minutes ago, Soidog said:

I feel sorry for Harry in as much that he found Megan Markell. He was and remains a disturbed and insecure soul and understandably so. His mother was killed when he was very young in the full glare of the worlds media. Unfortunately for Harry, he found someone who deliberately, or by chance, played to those insecurities. 
 

All of this would be bad enough if they were taking place in a normal family. However, this is being played out on the world stage. Harry continues to criticise the very institution he continues to use to make millions from. He demands to hold on to certain Royal privileges while criticising the very institution he bemoans. He confuses in his mind the Royal family and the Royal institution.

I did think that when he left his Royal duties (it’s a job not a family role) he would head off with his new wife and live a quiet peaceful and happy life. Instead, his delusional disorder continues to grow. I can’t help but feel this is fuelled by Megan who see all of this as a way to raise her profile, become the global mega star she always longed for during her acting career and Harry is caught up in it due to him falling in love with her. It’s all rather sad for everyone. Harry thinks his mother would be proud of him. I actually think the rift he has with his brother would make her turn in her grave. Very sad all round and I wish they would all back off and find happiness. Life is too short…

I think you are reading too much into it.

Harry is one pissed off guy. He saw his mothers life ruined by the media. His own life has been ruined by the media. And through it all his own family have left him twisting in the wind. You and I would be the same.

Now he plays to the media in the US where he gets a far better reception. He no longer cares what the UK media think.

[Soidog]

28 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

I think you are reading too much into it.

Harry is one pissed off guy. He saw his mothers life ruined by the media. His own life has been ruined by the media. And through it all his own family have left him twisting in the wind. You and I would be the same.

Now he plays to the media in the US where he gets a far better reception. He no longer cares what the UK media think.

The media only turned when Harry and Meghan started to attack the British Royals and the institution. The Daily Mail were positive about the news of the engagement, marriage and first born.
 

like I said, I do have some sympathy with Harry and I think things could have played out differently had he met a different partner in life. That’s not to say I’m blaming Meghan, it’s just an unfortunate mix. I think it would be difficult for anyone to suddenly find themselves in the middle of such an institution. I think especially so for a mixed race American woman. That’s no more a short coming of Meghan than it is the inflexibility of such an age old massive institution. 
 

[JohninDublin]

9 minutes ago, Soidog said:

I feel sorry for Harry in as much that he found Megan Markell. He was and remains a disturbed and insecure soul and understandably so. His mother was killed when he was very young in the full glare of the worlds media. Unfortunately for Harry, he found someone who deliberately, or by chance, played to those insecurities. 
 

All of this would be bad enough if they were taking place in a normal family. However, this is being played out on the world stage. Harry continues to criticise the very institution he continues to use to make millions from. He demands to hold on to certain Royal privileges while criticising the very institution he bemoans. He confuses in his mind the Royal family and the Royal institution.

I did think that when he left his Royal duties (it’s a job not a family role) he would head off with his new wife and live a quiet peaceful and happy life. Instead, his delusional disorder continues to grow. I can’t help but feel this is fuelled by Megan who see all of this as a way to raise her profile, become the global mega star she always longed for during her acting career and Harry is caught up in it due to him falling in love with her. It’s all rather sad for everyone. Harry thinks his mother would be proud of him. I actually think the rift he has with his brother would make her turn in her grave. Very sad all round and I wish they would all back off and find happiness. Life is too short…

I still don't understand this need for the public to pass judgement on the up's and down's of celeb marriages, mainly based on media reports. Especially as in this case, they appear happily married. 

John Lennon should never have married Yoko Ono (because she was too ugly was a common reason given). Charles should have never married Camilla (same reason often given). And there were those who objected to Harry marrying a woman of colour. 

For years I've been questioing the intellect of the Gay community. At a time when the hetero community were increasingly eschewing marriage, Gays felt that they must have marriage rights to have equality. Were they not seeing the failure of this institution with their own parents? When a couple marry, all you can do is wish them the best of luck in their marriage. But it seems that we can be so curmudgeonly when we disapprove of one of the partners in a marrage. It's almost as if we want to see these marriages fail to vindicate our own opinions. "I told you so". But it seems that the people who the public don't want to see marrying each other, are succeeding where others are failing as far as marriage is concerned.

[Soidog]

4 minutes ago, JohninDublin said:

I still don't understand this need for the public to pass judgement on the up's and down's of celeb marriages, mainly based on media reports. Especially as in this case, they appear happily married. 

John Lennon should never have married Yoko Ono (because she was too ugly was a common reason given). Charles should have never married Camilla (same reason often given). And there were those who objected to Harry marrying a woman of colour. 

For years I've been questioing the intellect of the Gay community. At a time when the hetero community were increasingly eschewing marriage, Gays felt that they must have marriage rights to have equality. Were they not seeing the failure of this institution with their own parents? When a couple marry, all you can do is wish them the best of luck in their marriage. But it seems that we can be so curmudgeonly when we disapprove of one of the partners in a marrage. It's almost as if we want to see these marriages fail to vindicate our own opinions. "I told you so". But it seems that the people who the public don't want to see marrying each other, are succeeding where others are failing as far as marriage is concerned.

I agree with all of that. It’s a sad world we live in. Mind you, I’m baffled why Reality TV is so popular. The fascination for the intimate details of other people’s life’s is a strange trait of humans. People seem to get a kick out of watching others misery. Perhaps it makes their own miserable life’s feel more normal? 

[JohninDublin]

10 minutes ago, Soidog said:

I agree with all of that. It’s a sad world we live in. Mind you, I’m baffled why Reality TV is so popular. The fascination for the intimate details of other people’s life’s is a strange trait of humans. People seem to get a kick out of watching others misery. Perhaps it makes their own miserable life’s feel more normal? 

Schadenfreude can be very addictive. Though I reserve mine for Wet Sham fans. It's far too precious to waste on less important matters.

[Rookiescot]

22 minutes ago, Soidog said:

The media only turned when Harry and Meghan started to attack the British Royals and the institution. The Daily Mail were positive about the news of the engagement, marriage and first born.
 

like I said, I do have some sympathy with Harry and I think things could have played out differently had he met a different partner in life. That’s not to say I’m blaming Meghan, it’s just an unfortunate mix. I think it would be difficult for anyone to suddenly find themselves in the middle of such an institution. I think especially so for a mixed race American woman. That’s no more a short coming of Meghan than it is the inflexibility of such an age old massive institution. 
 

The Daily Mail has had a pathological hatred of Harry and Megan for a long time. Culminating in them getting rightfully sued in court. Also the Express. What links these two papers? The fact they are right wing rags and openly racist.

As for his family. How would you feel if someone asked "What colour will the baby be"? 

Harry is the ONLY royal I would go out for a pint with.

We might just have to agree to disagree on this one.

[Soidog]

2 minutes ago, JohninDublin said:

Schadenfreude can be very addictive. Though I reserve mine for Wet Sham fans. It's far too precious to waste on less important matters.

Are you referring to West Ham?

[Rookiescot]

2 hours ago, JohninDublin said:

I think you should google "Was Corbyn A Globalist", and you will find plenty of evidence that he wasn't.

Having said that Corbyn was pro Brexit which has left me scratching my head ever since.

[Rookiescot]

2 minutes ago, Soidog said:

Are you referring to West Ham?

Speak not their name. Same as the unwashed ones from the east of Glasgow.

[JohninDublin]

19 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

Having said that Corbyn was pro Brexit which has left me scratching my head ever since.

Yes it's so ironic, that there were those on the left (Corbyn)  who thought that the EU was a "rich man's club", whlle those on the right often viewed it as socialist conspiracy.

[JohninDublin]

15 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

Speak not their name. Same as the unwashed ones from the east of Glasgow.

Don't get me started now (hahaha).

[Soidog]

Harry has overstepped the mark and overstepped protocol when he says he has killed 25 Taliban. He may have the protection he needs to stop some lone wolf Muslim from attacking him, the lads who served alongside him won’t have that security cover. Bad form all round from Harry and he should know better. 

[Soidog]

1 hour ago, Rookiescot said:

As for his family. How would you feel if someone asked "What colour will the baby be"

I’d be horrified. But where is the proof of this and who said it? This is all conjecture by Harry and Meghan. 

 

1 hour ago, Rookiescot said:

Harry is the ONLY royal I would go out for a pint with.

We might just have to agree to disagree on this one.

I’d go for a pint with a few of them, particularly Kate

It’s an emotive topic and it polarises views. Happy to agree to disagree. 
 

Just to be clear, I don’t think the couple should be being subjected to this level of criticism but they are kind of fuelling it by continually making Netflix series, writing books and doing interviews. Why don’t they just sort it out privately. This is a family issue. 

[JohninDublin]

37 minutes ago, Soidog said:

Harry has overstepped the mark and overstepped protocol when he says he has killed 25 Taliban. He may have the protection he needs to stop some lone wolf Muslim from attacking him, the lads who served alongside him won’t have that security cover. Bad form all round from Harry and he should know better. 

I tend to treat such claims of "bravery" with a degree of scepticism. I remember Andrew in the Falkland and hearing that his role as a copter pilot was to decoy Exocet missiles. This was the first British war that had a heavy media presence, yet I never saw a single pic of him in a copter during that conflict.

Have seen pics of Harry firing a machine gun out of a copter, but not what he was shooting at. But if you are firing a MG from distance, how do you know how many you killed?

And of course, the Taliban are upset at such claims. Maybe not a wise move to have told this story. The finally got to Rushdie after over 30 years.

[JohninDublin]

46 minutes ago, Soidog said:

I’d be horrified. But where is the proof of this and who said it? This is all conjecture by Harry and Meghan. 

I understood it was an allegation as opposed to conjecture.

[JohninDublin]

49 minutes ago, Soidog said:

Just to be clear, I don’t think the couple should be being subjected to this level of criticism but they are kind of fuelling it by continually making Netflix series, writing books and doing interviews. Why don’t they just sort it out privately. This is a family issue. 

I can have a lot of sympathy with that comment. I generally take the view, "Why don't the public mind their own business"? but with apparently "press briefing" being the order of the day, I feel I need to moderate my opinions on the general public's addiction to such dross.