Jump to content

What are Health Services like in your country?


Recommended Posts

  On 2/13/2023 at 3:36 AM, WilliamG said:

The former may need foodbanks or struggle financially, the latter do not.

Expand  

People earning £36000 a year do not need food banks, only irresponsible people who cannot budget. There are many people earning a fraction of what they get that are not greedy enough to use food banks. I can't remember food banks in the 50s and 60s when people were earning a pittance because those people didn't buy things they couldn't afford.

  • Like 2
  On 2/13/2023 at 3:45 AM, Marble-eye said:

People earning £36000 a year do not need food banks, only irresponsible people who cannot budget. There are many people earning a fraction of what they get that are not greedy enough to use food banks. I can't remember food banks in the 50s and 60s when people were earning a pittance because those people didn't buy things they couldn't afford.

Expand  

If a nurse on £720 a week has got three school-age children to feed healthily and clothe, needs to run a car to get them to school, needs good broadband so the kids can all do their homework at the same time, then I can see that there would not be a lot left for weekend. But, yes as you say, proper budgeting is the answer.

  • 2 months later...

NHS is far better in uk if your an illegal immigrant or in prison , same a housing , illegals jump queues and uk homeless left on streets but politicians feel that are helping because their voices get heard where their pockets can be filled , NHS managers should be reduced and stop the diversity and over non productive bs,  NHS should be legally protected against lawsuits, so not need lawyers , if you got problem with that go private , let the money be spent on doctors nursing and medications 

  On 2/14/2023 at 1:30 AM, WilliamG said:

If a nurse on £720 a week has got three school-age children to feed healthily and clothe, needs to run a car to get them to school, needs good broadband so the kids can all do their homework at the same time, then I can see that there would not be a lot left for weekend. But, yes as you say, proper budgeting is the answer.

Expand  

Then don't have kids or cars.  Its not rocket science.  Don't live above your income and if its not enough, then change your job.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  On 2/13/2023 at 3:45 AM, Marble-eye said:

People earning £36000 a year do not need food banks, only irresponsible people who cannot budget. There are many people earning a fraction of what they get that are not greedy enough to use food banks. I can't remember food banks in the 50s and 60s when people were earning a pittance because those people didn't buy things they couldn't afford.

Expand  

Quite right 

  • Thanks 1
  • Cool 1
  On 2/13/2023 at 3:45 AM, Marble-eye said:

People earning £36000 a year do not need food banks, only irresponsible people who cannot budget. There are many people earning a fraction of what they get that are not greedy enough to use food banks. I can't remember food banks in the 50s and 60s when people were earning a pittance because those people didn't buy things they couldn't afford.

Expand  

Come on

"Earning a pittance" when you could buy a house for 20k

But I do agree that they didn't buy things they couldn't afford and we, as a whole, are very guilty of that 

  On 5/13/2023 at 1:52 PM, Marc26 said:

Come on

"Earning a pittance" when you could buy a house for 20k

But I do agree that they didn't buy things they couldn't afford and we, as a whole, are very guilty of that 

Expand  

Most people in the 50s and 60s probably rented, my personal circumstance as an apprentice engineer I was earning £2 a week and a pound of that went to my mother for board and my food, and to put things in perspective a pint of beer was 1 and 8pence, 1 gall of petrol was 3s and 6pence. Yes it was a pittance Mark, did you live through those times? 

  On 5/13/2023 at 2:16 PM, Marble-eye said:

Most people in the 50s and 60s probably rented, my personal circumstance as an apprentice engineer I was earning £2 a week and a pound of that went to my mother for board and my food, and to put things in perspective a pint of beer was 1 and 8pence, 1 gall of petrol was 3s and 6pence. Yes it was a pittance Mark, did you live through those times? 

Expand  

No I'm not that old

But millions of people were able to afford to buy houses in the 50-60's on the wages back then

And it's a lot harder now to buy a house for people 

  On 5/14/2023 at 12:05 AM, Marc26 said:

No I'm not that old

But millions of people were able to afford to buy houses in the 50-60's on the wages back then

And it's a lot harder now to buy a house for people 

Expand  
  On 5/13/2023 at 1:52 PM, Marc26 said:

"Earning a pittance" when you could buy a house for 20k

Expand  

Maybe in the US you could but in the UK your figure of 20,000 if we convert it to £s would equate in todays money of nearly half a million pounds, still quite a tidy sum would you agree. 

But you originally questioned my remark of "earning a pittance" which by todays standards was a pittance. 

The 1950s were the 'never had is so good' years. Wages were rising quickly, but living standards were well below today's.

On average people earned a lot less than they do today, even allowing for inflation.

In 1950 the average weekly wage was £5.60. In 1959 it was £8.90, an increase of nearly 60%. 

https://www.retrowow.co.uk/social_history/50s/earnings_1950s.php#:~:text=The 1950s were the 'never,today%2C even allowing for inflation.&text=Today average weekly earnings are £570.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By posting on Thaiger Talk you agree to the Terms of Use