Jump to content

News Forum - Woman demands cash from Bangkok mall after being bitten by a venomous snake


Recommended Posts

A Thai woman complained on social media that a Bangkok shopping mall refuses to take responsibility after she got bitten by a venomous snake in the mall’s car park in the Bang Kae district. The woman posted her story on Facebook under the account name, Apple Samart, on July 31, where she uploaded pictures of the offending snake, a red tailed pit viper, and her swollen foot. Apple Samart wrote… “Warning!!! Being bitten by a snake while walking inside a shopping mall in Bang Kae. The shopping mall refused to take action, saying they weren’t the owner of the snake.” […]

The story Woman demands cash from Bangkok mall after being bitten by a venomous snake as seen on Thaiger News.

Read the full story

  • Like 1

I don't see why the owners of a car park should be responsible for the actions of a wild snake. Snakes go almost anywhere they want to go. What should the owners do? Set up snake patrols?

What if a bee stings someone and it gets infected? Should the owners of the car park be liable?

  • Like 4
1 hour ago, Loong said:

I don't see why the owners of a car park should be responsible for the actions of a wild snake. Snakes go almost anywhere they want to go. What should the owners do? Set up snake patrols?

What if a bee stings someone and it gets infected? Should the owners of the car park be liable?

I believe most malls put up a sign that says park at your own risk at the entrance. Maybe to preempt situations like this.

Is their property  they are responsible. What if I make a camp fire on the lot?                        < unintelligible sentence removed>

Moderator.

Edited by Faz
unintelligible grammar
  • Confused 1

People will try anything to get some money they feel entitled to how can the mall be responsible for a snake on their property? It’s a wild creature that will just defend itself she probably stepped on it. 

Amused by Thai language headline in the linked Khaosod source article, which translates through Google as:

"She killed the snake, which removed any future recourse.".  Nice one!

In addition to that refreshing take on this, I'm also chuffed that Thaiger staff smartly characterized the snake in question as venomous, not poisonous.  On ya'! 👍

  • Like 3

Well realistically the mall should have some sort of insurance that would cover it. They should step up and offer something even if it is not theri fault. Wouldn't want to get bit by any viper.

  • Like 1

Not seeing how it is the Malls fault a snake got into their car park, does that make it the municipal authorities fault if it happens on a road or pavement? Surprised they offered to pay her medical bills as in the west that could be construed as an admission of liability.

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By posting on Thaiger Talk you agree to the Terms of Use