If that were true then 1) where are you getting your information from? and 2) the answer lies in the fact that the sources you cited, which report the supposed "truth," are all leftist MSM outlets. So I call bullshit here.
No shit. Comer is a Republican. But the mere fact that someone is partisan does not equate definitively and automatically to their information being wrong.
Now that allegation against Trump is from a partisan source but oddly and suddenly you have no problem with partisanship as you eagerly accept it as truth beyond question. No mention of partisanship at all. Which highlights your hypocrisy.
The media is partisan, though. Or would you deny that? Again, your hypocrisy is on display. There exist more than just the MSM and there are other media outlets which make the case that Biden is indeed corrupt. You do not, I believe, give them any credibility and I doubt you investigate any of their findings or read any of their articles. As indicated by this statement.
I provide a link to Marco Polo for evidence. That you are asking for evidence when it is supplied is a firm indication that are not interested in any truth other than what you want to believe is true. In other words, you are only interested in your truth. Or rather your perceived truth. Which indicates to me you are not an honest fellow as you have no interest in acquainting yourself with the other side of the story.
Are you forgetting Joe taking showers with his daughter, Ashley? Or do you dismiss that out of hand as a "wild allegation" because it's information which doesn't fit your belief that "Joe Biden is a real father."
Does it strike you as odd that every negative about Joe Biden is a "wild accusation?: Whereas every negative about Trump is rock solid truth and he's convicted as guilty in the public court of opinion before any of the real truth comes out? Does not the hypocrisy slap you in the face? Does not the dishonesty slap you in the face even harder? I'd ask you again: are you interested in any real truth or are you singularly interested in confirming what you believe to be true? Are you even interested in honesty? I don't see any indication of it thus far as evidenced by the fact that your views are totally one-sided. Very unbalanced. That is not a sign of honesty or objectivity but rather the opposite of it.
The fact that you repeat the MSM/Dem/leftist/Marxist/globalist narrative that MAGA are extremists, a claim which is 100% fabricated and has not a shred of truth to it, is just another indicator that your bias is to such an extreme, as is your dishonesty, that to consider the possibility of your ability to be purely objective and fair, as it would be for anyone interested in only the truth, I would put the odds at zero to zilch.
Now when asked whether or not you believe in the sanctity of life you questioned, in so many words, what's that? and claimed that "sanctity of life is a construct of a number of religions" despite murder being considered the foremost abominable crime in most every society around the world since the dawn of time. You then proceeded to express the sentiment above which indicates to me that you are a quite unhinged personality, to but it very mildly, and I would be extremely hesitant to put any stock into any of your judgments, your opinions, your views on life, or your interpretations of the events of the world.
Sorry to say, Vigo, but I just can't agree with any of your post.
If it's true that the MSM is neither left nor right leaning then show me a single article where they praise Trump or even give him credit for a single action or accomplishment. You might find one when he bombed Syria after one of the last chemical attacks. But other than that if you find that you cannot come up with a single, positive article about Trump from the likes of the NYT, WaPo, Newsweek, Vanity Fair, MSNBC, ABC, etc. then you would have to explain how you account for it.
During Trump's term in office how many false articles were written about the Russia Collusion hoax, which turned out to be false? I believe the Pulitzer Prize was given one year to journalists who wrote a Russian Collusion hoax article which turned out to be blatantly false. The prize was never retracted even after Trump sued.
How many articles do you find which go against the left? How many articles do you find that go after the right? Do you find it to be lopsided? Heavily lopsided?
Same with fact checkers. Have you noticed that there was no such thing as fact checkers until the truth started coming out. Fact checkers are a very recent development, and rose to prominence especially during Covid to help squash any information which went against the MSM narrative either in regards to it's origins or alternative treatments. In fact, many of the fact checkers are supported by the MSM or have ties to them.
While people would accuse me of being on the right because I defend and support some of the actors and some of their stances in truth I am neither on the right nor the left. If it were up to me I would outlaw all political parties as they are all corrupt to the bone. Perhaps not when initially formed but as we are all familiar with Lord Acton's quote:
“Power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority; still more when you superadd the tendency of the certainty of corruption by authority.”
Humans by and large have not yet acquired that knowledge which would prevent them from debauching their souls. Reread that statement until it is thoroughly understood.