How anybody could remotely believe that this ditsy vacant looking blond with no prior relevant success, had somehow acquired some earth- shattering “special knowledge” that had eluded scientists, engineers & technicians developing & specifying blood tests for last fifty years or more, is beyond belief, and speaks volumes on the credibility and reliability of the idiot “ investors” piling in like demented lemmings, with zero normal business research, which could not have failed to expose this shameless charlatan and her nonsense.
I'm not foreign for the thought that Cannabis can have some adverse effects, but a radiology report is neither a rigorous study nor something free of major confounding effects.
Speaking of tobacco, there is little to no doubt how harmful it is to heart, lungs, skin, mutagenicity (causing cancers) and even the endocrine system.
The two agents are not anywhere in the same league, at least not based on accumulated evidence.
The cold civil war is continuing. And it is still the MSM versus less corporatized news sources. The veneer of credibility the MSM has wrapped itself in over the last 50 years is definitely looking more and more like a torn rag.
While I believe there MAY be "neutral" news sources out there, they are neither significant nor truly neutral if they should gain significance.
The fight over who gets to be the president will be intense and I don't think anyone should expect too many white knights roaming around.
Biden may strive to be a new Clinton (?) or simply himself; while Trump a Reagan (or Trump the second).
Both may very well end up more as the next Gorbatchew .